Category: Education

Counter-Revolutionary Classical Education

6/3/2024

Counter-Revolutionary Classical Education
From our Online Academy teacher, Adam De Gree
Our schools, universities, and media have been captured by a cult. We need a counter-revolution that replaces the revolutionary dogmas of DEI with what has always been at the core of a good education.

1.    The Good
2.    The True
3.    The Beautiful

At Classical Historian, we uphold these eternal values. Our materials are apolitical, and we welcome dialogue with anyone who honestly seeks the truth. But that doesn't mean that we don't see what's happening to our country.

According to a comprehensive survey by The Institute for Citizens & Scholars, only 27% of people under the age of 45 have "a very basic understanding" of history. In the words of esteemed historian David McCullough, Americans are suffering from collective amnesia. The result? A people that has no defense against would-be revolutionaries.

As of 2024, it's clear that radicals dominate nearly every institution that Americans rely on to learn about the world. Prestigious universities tolerate vicious antisemitism in the name of social justice. The head of NPR claims that truth is subjective and brags about working with the CIA to censor Wikipedia. Federal agencies conspire with Big Tech to suppress dissent. Men give birth, left is right, up is down, war is peace.

The American way of life is under attack. We believe that the best way that ordinary people can protect their traditions is to ensure their children receive a genuine, rigorous, and classical education. As James Madison wrote, "The advancement and diffusion of knowledge...is the only guardian of true liberty."

Parallel Education System
Since so many schools have been captured by ideologues, Americans have started building a parallel education system. This system, comprised of charter schools, private classical schools, and homeschools, exists side-by-side with traditional institutions. In it, students and families are receiving a better education than in mainstream schools.

This isn't the first time this has happened. Czechoslovak dissidents like Vaclav Havel faced a similar situation in Czechoslovakia in the late 1970s. Seeing that the Communist Party had corrupted every social organization, they started forming what they called the parallel polis, or parallel society.

Czechoslovak dissidents founded an underground university, scouting groups, Christian communities, theater associations, and printing presses. They fundraised for those who had been "cancelled" out of a job for speaking the truth. Most importantly, they created the opportunity to live a normal life in a revolutionary regime.

And as N.S. Lyons writes:
"In doing so they did far more than keep up morale with pleasant intellectual diversions. They built a resilient base of organization from the ground up. They forged an experienced leadership cadre. They created a flexible underground network-state. And, when the weakened Communist state collapsed, they found themselves poised to quickly step in and fill the vacuum. Suddenly their parallel polis became the polis. Much of the chaos that other post-Communist states faced was thereby peacefully avoided."

The parallel education system we're now seeing shoot up across America is built upon time-tested principles. If public schools can't be saved, they don't need to be. We have an alternative.

Educating American Leaders
Americans know enough about traditional public education to know that they've had enough of it. Homeschooling is growing at a record pace, and in 2024, more than 1 in 20 American schoolchildren learn at home. Moreover, the number of charter schools has grown by about 50 percent over the last ten years.

Excitingly, there are likely over 1 million students receiving a classical education right now. And with 34 percent of students set to benefit from school choice in 2024, that number is growing fast.

Critics might point out that this still leaves the vast majority of students in the public school system. That's certainly true. But consider this: 54% of American adults read at or below the sixth-grade level. Moreover, a full 21% of adults are illiterate. Are these ill-served Americans likely to form the next generation of leaders? That seems unlikely.

On the other hand, students in the parallel education system consistently outperform those in mainstream schools. Homeschoolers earn significantly higher test scores than public school students, and they have higher than average social, emotional, and psychological development. More importantly, they enjoy more professional success, participate in more community service activities, and internalize the values of their parents at higher rates than the public schooled.

The burgeoning charter school movement is seeing similar results. According to a comprehensive study of over 6,000 charter schools, 83 percent of charter school students perform at or better than their peer cohort in reading, and 75 percent perform the same or better in math. And while studies on classical school performance are few and far between, early research shows that classical school graduates have huge advantages over public school students.

This indicates that the future leaders of America won't be coming from public schools. They will have had the great advantage of learning in the parallel education system.

Raising Critical Thinkers
How is any of this counter-revolutionary? Here's what John Adams had to say on this topic:

“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”

Knowledge is a prerequisite for self-government. If we lose our knowledge, we will lose our ability to govern ourselves. But that does not mean that there will be no government. It simply means that the government will no longer be of the people, by the people, and for the people. Instead, it will be a government of the powerful, by the powerful, and for the powerful.

But it's not just that an uneducated populace cannot govern itself. It's that people who have been cut off from their heritage make easy prey for ideological radicals. If they do not understand the many catastrophes of history, people will not appreciate the civilization that sustains them. To the contrary, they will be manipulated by those who want to tear it down.

Just consider the scenes unfolding across college campuses in 2024. As students with no knowledge of world history or geography chanted, "From the River to the Sea" without knowing which river or what sea they were referring to, America's enemies must have been deeply satisfied. The empty heads of American youth served as fertile soil for explicitly Marxist propaganda.

Counter-Revolutionary Classical Education
Revolutionary regimes have always preyed on the ignorant. People who have no critical thinking skills have formed the backbone of totalitarian societies from Czechoslovakia to Ethiopia and from China to Cuba. Ironically, many have supported oppression in the name of social justice and humanitarian principles.

Classical education stands as an obstacle to those who would destroy their own country. Rather than raising the useful idiots of tomorrow, it cultivates critical thinkers who know a rat when they see one.

Students who have grappled with the great ideas of Western Civilization will not jump on the bandwagon and call for an end to America. Instead, they will be drawn towards Truth, Beauty, and Goodness like a deer is drawn to running water. Thanks to them, we can have hope in our nation's future.

We provide classical history curriculum, history games, online discussion courses, and educator resources for the counter-revolution. Join us.

It’s Personal
When our co-founder Zdenka went to school in Czechoslovakia in the 1970s, teachers had to teach Communist ideology in the classroom. Anyone caught teaching counter to this thinking could be turned into the authorities. Good Czechoslovak Communists, they said, would report any counter-revolutionary activities to the relevant authorities.

When Zdenka was in her early 20s, Czechs and Slovaks rose up peacefully to overthrow the Marxists. She joined protests and passed out pamphlets calling for freedom. Some of her friends were arrested and beaten by police for their "counter-revolutionary activities."

Luckily, the counter-revolution carried the day. Ordinary people stood up to state violence and said that they didn't want to live in a revolutionary regime. They wanted a return to normalcy.

Growing up in a totalitarian society, Zdenka used to look to America as an example of freedom. Yet after living in California for over 20 years, she knows that many Marxists have brought their revolution here.

Americans still enjoy freedoms that are rarely protected in other countries. But as time goes on, it's becoming more difficult to live a normal life in the US. Everywhere you look, you see people trying to replace normalcy with revolutionary ideas.

Not at Classical Historian. We offer a traditional historical perspective, one that rejects revolutionary dogmas. We believe in good old ideas like beauty, truth, and goodness. Our materials promote the virtues required for self-government. And yes, we're proud to be an American company.

If these are counter-revolutionary ideas, then we're proud to be counter-revolutionary educators. But really, we just think we're normal Americans.

0 Comments

A Bias Against Western Civilization and the United States of America - Textbooks

8/18/2021

2 Comments

Last week, I received an email from a friend who pays a considerable amount of money to send her child to a reputable Christian school. She and a few other parents at the school were worried that the high school’s American history book was anti-Western Civilization, anti-Christian, and Socialist. Sadly, they were correct. The school leaders, like many in the United States of America, have chosen an anti-American American history book. It is unknown if the school leaders realized this when they chose the book, or if the teacher had the authority to use the text. To assist in trying to make the school leaders stop using this book, I reviewed the first few pages. Included below are my initial notes on the book.
Eric Foner’s American history book Give Me Liberty, An American History, in its first few pages, attempts to show that the European discovery, exploration, and colonization of the New World was a travesty and that Western society in North and South America was built on slavery, misogyny, a Christian religion that was a tool to use to justify mistreatment, and the subjugation of the great majority of people. Foner oversimplifies, generalizes, and cherry-picks anecdotes to fit his narrative while at the same time ignoring historical truths that contradict his story. To put it simply, in the first 13 pages, Foner shows Europeans as bad and Indians of North and South America as good. Europeans are portrayed as greedy, women-dominating males eager to exploit the social-minded, family-loving, and gentle American Indians. Foner’s book is less history than a tract promoting a Socialist interpretation of Western society. Foner portrays European actions and thoughts as aimed only at subjugation and dominance over others, and, he shows European society as one based on class, privilege, and gender. He writes about Christianity only as if it existed to support the political, economic, and social goals of Europeans and distinct from any real religious or spiritual meaning. Foner attempts to downplay any positive role Europeans had in North and South America and tries to show that Europeans did not enjoy any freedoms or liberties that were better than what Indians experienced at the time the two cultures met. At all times, Foner ignores any negative aspects of Native American societies, twists the meaning of private property, falsely portrays the history of slavery, belittles the development of individual liberty in western societies, and ignores the gender inequalities in Native societies.
Examples:

Page 1: Foner belittles Columbus’ discovery of America by stating “Historians no longer use the word ‘discovery’ to describe the European exploration, conquest, and colonization already home to millions of people.” This is false. Many historians use the term discovery. Foner attempts to destroy Columbus’ positive role in bringing Western Civilization to the Americas, and it starts with Columbus’ first act of discovery.
Page 1: Foner writes that “No society represents a single culture or people” and attempts to write that there actually was not a separate European culture at the time of Columbus. He tries to belittle the historical fact that Europe, from Columbus’ time on, was the dominant continent in the world in terms of political, social, and economic influence. He never tries to answer the question, “Why was Europe dominant from the 15th through the 20th centuries?”
Page 3: Foner falsely equates the development of freedom with the development of slavery in the New World. He writes, “The conditions that enabled millions of settlers to take control of their own destinies were made possible by the debasement of millions of others.” This is a false and historically inaccurate understanding of history of all people throughout time. The existence of slavery has existed throughout history. American Indians practiced slavery. But to claim that the European-American society was based on slavery is reductionist and incomplete, and the argument could be made that EVERY society was based on slavery until Great Britain began the movement to end slavery in the world in the 19th century. Slavery, as practiced in North and South America, was not unique in the world and therefore does not represent something unique. However, the development of liberty in America was unique in the world. Nowhere else could so many vote, speak freely, write what they wanted, and more. The development of freedom in America was exceptional. America’s practice of slavery in the South was common. Foner’s focus on slavery when it serves his purpose to denigrate the development of history is disingenuous.
Page 4: Foner writes, “History in North and South America did not begin with the coming of Europeans.” He is historically inaccurate. History means the written recording of human events. Before this is called prehistory. In North and South America, only the Mayas had a written language, a hieroglyphic system of 800 symbols. For all of the other Native Americans, history began in the New World with the Spanish.
Pages 1-10: In all of Foner’s explanation of the natives of the New World, there is nothing negative. There is no mention of the American Indian practices of human sacrifice, cannibalism, wife-stealing, polygamy, neglecting of children by fathers, destruction of the environment, lack of scientific knowledge of health, rape as common for prisoners of war or for slaves, abandonment of the elderly, theft as a form of ritual into manhood, etc. While Foner writes that it was simple for Spain to enlist other tribes to fight the Aztecs, he does not explain the horrific way the Aztecs treated those they conquered. The reader understands no historical context in learning about Native Americans and Europeans and is left to believe that the natives were good and the outsiders were bad. Students will not be able to understand the complexity of history when societies are misrepresented so simplistically.
Page 5: Foner writes, “Indian societies had perfected techniques of farming, hunting, and fishing” but he does not explain what he means by perfect. He writes about the Indians “perfecting” a number of things. The reader is meant to assume that no other society had learned how to farm, hunt, or fish better than the Indians. But, at many levels, this is false. Europeans were able to grow more crops in greater abundance, feed more amount of people, sustain a longer life expectancy, hunt more animals and fish quicker, and were more able to manage animal population much better than Native Americans. In the early 1500s, Europeans lived longer, were physically bigger and stronger, and had a wider selection of diet than Native Americans. When nomadic Indians overused an area of land, they moved on, leaving behind their waste. Europeans struggled to find ways how to remove and treat waste so that it would not be a detriment to their lives. Though not perfect, Europeans had better hygiene, better health care, better diet, and lived longer than Indians. Foner never attempts to discuss this.
Page 9: Foner cherry-picks the attributes of Indians in order to show them in the most positive light. He writes, “The most striking feature of Native American society at the time Europeans arrived was its sheer diversity. Each group had its own political system and set of religious beliefs,” but also, “Generosity was among the most valued social qualities, and gift giving was essential to Indian society.” Foner attempts to paint Native Americans as having completely unique societies, but at the same time, he tries to write that all Indians valued gift giving as a way of achieving or maintaining power. He gives no specific examples of this claim of gift giving. While gift giving was important among Indians of the Northwest, for Indians of the Northeast and the Plains, essential was a warrior’s and hunter’s prowess, not gift-giving.
Page 10: Foner writes, “Under normal circumstances no one in Indian societies went hungry or experienced the extreme inequalities of Europe.” He then cites one colonist’s quote to support his argument. However, Indians owned slaves who experienced depravities that Antebellum American society would believe as barbaric and inhumane. Indians of the Northeast and the Plains terrorized, raped, and murdered those they deemed as enemies or conquests. In addition, the Indian society Foner writes about consisted only of a number of families. If we compare that to prehistoric times of Western man, we could also make the argument that European prehistoric clans did not experience great differences in wealth. Everyone was equally poor and existed in poor conditions all the time. Foner’s comparisons between Indians and Europeans are between a prehistoric, nomadic people, and a pre-industrial, medieval society. He points out the differences only when it shows the Indians in a good light.
Page 12: Foner writes, “Buying and selling of slaves was unknown.” This is historically false. Native Americans practiced slavery, bought and sold slaves, and gambled with slaves before and after Europeans arrived. No serious historian doubts this fact.
Page 13: Foner writes, “One conception common throughout Europe was that freedom was less political or social status than a moral or spiritual condition. Freedom meant abandoning the life of sin to embrace the teachings of Christ.” Foner attempts to belittle or destroy the idea that Western Civilization is the home of liberty. He completely ignores the European, and especially, English, concept of political rights, the development of individual rights in western society, the Magna Carta, and the development of the corporation in England in late medieval society. It is hard to understand how Foner could write about European freedom and not mention the political development of independent rights, limiting the power of kings, rights of noblemen, rights of serfs, and development of the free enterprise system. The only conclusion that can be made of Foner’s interpretation of European history is that Europeans did not enjoy greater rights and freedoms than Native Americans, but enjoyed a “different understanding” of rights. Under Foner’s understanding, neither society had a better experience of freedom, and the spread of European culture in the Americas did not mean the spread of freedom across the two continents. Foner’s anti-Western culture perspective is apparent in his misunderstanding and misrepresentation of liberty in the west.

2 Comments

Common Core Standards

6/17/2015

0 Comments

The Common Core

Jason Riley of the Wall Street Journal quoted someone that there are two reasons why a person would write a book. One reason is that it brings joy to the author. The other reason is that the writer is compelled to write about the topic. While these articles I’ve written are not books, they are not enjoyable to write. And while I recognize there are much better writers to express their knowledge and thoughts on the Common Core, there is not an abundance of articles on this very important topic of education in America.

For the past two years, I’ve written articles around this time of year on the Common Core Standards. In May 2014, my article details facts about the creation of Common Core, including the deception that it was led by the states, the financial incentives President Obama used to influence states to accept this national program, and the academic weakness of the standards. In May of 2013, I wrote primarily about the intrusive data mining the Common Core Standards implement in our schools and the turning away from a Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman set of academic standards. To read these, you may scroll down. Unfortunately, none of the facts or claims made in these two articles, written two and one year ago, have proven to be false.

In this article, I would like to share with you some personal notes as a teacher in a public school. Officially, I am not allowed to speak or write about anything that is specifically on these test, nor am I allowed to look at the test that the students take on their computers. I’ve signed official documents promising I would not do these things. So, my comments won’t be specifically on the test, but they will focus on what the students have told me, and what other teachers have shared that involves the process of the test.

No student prefers this test over the previous tests. The most common complaint is that students don’t like to take the test on a computer screen. They are unable to write notes on the text, as any good book reader is taught to do. After an hour or so of concentrating on a screen, it is challenging to pay attention. To read an entire passage, students have to scroll down, thus taking away part of the article.

No teacher prefers this test over previous tests. Common complaints I’ve heard is that the test is so incredibly hard, it does not give an accurate indication of what students have learned. Teachers have also shared with me that they feel completely separated from the test the students are taking, and the curriculum they should be designing. Since we are not officially allowed to look at the test or speak about it, how can we prepare our students? Another complaint is the massive amount of time spent on testing. In one school, for example, students spent two weeks taking the test. This was two weeks students were not learning anything.

Much of the complaints that students and teachers have is due to the fact that the Common Core Standards come from national organizations in cooperation with the federal government. The people who know their students best, the teachers, have the least amount of influence over how the students are tested, and thus, eventually, we all fear we will have the least amount of influence in how students are taught, and what they are taught. Is there anyone who believes the federal government will create the Common Core tests to promote historical perspectives that will not strengthen the federal government?

These personal experiences I have as a teacher in the Common Core are not held just by me, but they are also expressed in at least one lawsuit against the federal government by Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal. The state of Louisiana has brought a lawsuit against the federal government claiming that the federal government is taking over powers that are reserved to the states. Amendment X states that all powers not specifically granted to the national government are reserved to the people and the states. Over two centuries, everyone has understood this to mean that education is a state issue. This author hopes that the Common Core Standards is one more large governmental power grab the Obama administration loses.

Question:
1.      How many years has Mr. De Gree been writing about the Common Core Standards?
2.      What was the focus of his article written in May 2014?
3.      What was the focus of his article written in 2013?
4.      What do teachers and students say about the Common Core tests?
5.      How does the state you live in view the Common Core Standards?

I wrote the following article in May 2014:
Common Core Standards

The Common Core Standards present the greatest change in American education since compulsory education laws that started in Massachusetts in 1852. The Common Core takes control of education away from states and local boards and places it into the hands of its creators and the federal government. This is the first time in the history of the United States of America where key educational decisions are made by the federal, and not the state and local governments and families. It is the first time in history where national education standards are fully owned and copyrighted by a non-governmental entity and are not subject to be altered by the citizens.

Common Core began with a Bill and Melinda Gates $27 million grant to the James B. Hunt Institute. This money was used to support the National Governors Association, the Council of Chief State School Officers, and Achieve, Incorporated, three national organizations based in Washington, D.C. After these three organizations wrote the Common Core Standards, the Obama administration offered financial incentives to those states who adopted them. President Obama’s team called this financial incentive “Race to the Top.”

Proponents of the Common Core State Standards Initiative make many claims about Common Core that are contested, are not true, or are not based on academic studies. Proponents claim the standards are based on international standards, though offers no proof that they are. Proponents claim the national standards raise up the previous state standards, though the lead mathematics standards-writer reported that students passing its mathematics college-readiness test will only be ready for community and non-selective colleges, not the more demanding, selective universities. Proponents claim that its math standards prepare students for Algebra for 8th grade, but actually, the Standards place Algebra in Grade 9. The Common Core takes emphasis away from reading classical literature and instead places importance on reading informational literature. There are no studies presented that prove the efficacy of this decision.

There are problems involving claims about the process and implementation of the Standards by Common Core proponents. Proponents claim that the Standards were written by teachers and used a growing body of evidence. Actually, no teachers were involved in the standards writing, no teacher has claimed responsibility, and there are no public records on the creation of the standards. Common Core proponents do not cite the research or evidence used in k-12 for math and language arts. Proponents claim that this is a state-led effort, when in fact the standards are being implemented through the No Child Left Behind and newer federal legislation. The federal government offered Race to the Top funds to states only if they adopted the Common Core Standards. Proponents claim that this is not a national curriculum, though Bill Gates has explicitly stated it is. Proponents claim the Standards will not involve any data collection on students and their families, though a national database on all students will be collected as a result of the tests, and this information will be available to the administrators of the test and to the national government.

Common Core State Standards will continue to be a topic of great controversy, because the claims of its proponents are either untrue or debatable and because in 45 of 50 states, it is now the guiding principle of education. To read more on this topic, here is a list of interesting websites:

Common Core Website: http://www.corestandards.org/
Pioneer Institute (Against the Common Core):http://pioneerinstitute.org/common-core/
Freedom Project Education: https://fpeusa.org/index.php/about-fpe/lectures/common-core-free
Questions:
1.       How does Common Core change how educational decisions are made in the United States?
2.       What are two things proponents claim about the Common Core that are debatable or are not true?
Copyright ©2014 by John De Gree. All Rights Reserved.

A Note to our Readers
In no way am I able to hide my bias against the Common Core, and it probably came out in the article. In May of 2013, I wrote a blog about why I am against the Common Core, and my thoughts and feelings have only been reaffirmed through my experiences as a public schoolteacher. Since I wrote this blog, I am more convinced that the Common Core is terrible for American education. I will include the 2013 blog at the end of this letter, but I would also like to add a reason or two why the Common Core is bad for students, for teachers, and for our country.

Currently, there is no Common Core Standards for Social Studies, however, the teaching of history in schools is already influenced by these Standards. In California, the state has gotten rid of its state-wide testing regime, and in the process, California 8th graders are not tested of their knowledge of Ancient, Medieval, and American History. The California State Standards in Social Studies/History were Judeo-Christian based, and for the most part, showed how Greco-Roman Judeo-Christian principles are the foundation for American law, religion, thought, and philosophy. However, as there is no more state-wide-test to evaluate students on their knowledge of history, school districts are implementing various curriculum that support the Common Core standards, instead.

I had originally feared that the switch to Common Core would mean a devaluation of the importance of knowledge before analysis, and, I was concerned that the typically left-leaning educational leaders would downplay important historical documents and American figures in order to promote their agenda. It appears that both of my fears are happening. School districts are getting rid of challenging tests on the U.S. Constitution and replacing them with analysis of key moments in history. There is nothing wrong with having kids focus on key moments, however, how are we supposed to have a strong Constitutional republic when our students do not know what the Constitution is? I think that is the point of the educators and the Common Core proponents. They don’t want the U.S.A. to be a strong Constitutional republic. They instead want to be able to control individuals and transform society through the school system.

Lastly, there is no opportunity for schoolteachers to discuss or debate the Common Core standards, even though we are being forced to implement them. It is impossible to imagine what good can come of these standards, when the main players in teaching are not part of the process.

Why I am against the Common Core Standards
Written in May 2013

            You hand Johnny his packed lunch, give him a kiss, and smile as you see him run off to school. Once in the classroom, his teacher tells him that today is the big day to take the state test for Common Core. Johnny sits down in front of a computer and avails himself to the “four parallel streams of affective sensors.” A “facial expression camera” detects emotion, capturing facial expressions. The “posture analysis seat” analyzes the mood of Johnny based on how he sits. The “pressure mouse” analyzes how Johnny uses the computer mouse, and the “wireless skin conductance sensor” (a wide, black bracelet) collects “physiological response data from a biofeedback apparatus that measures blood volume, pulse, and galvanic skin response to examine student frustration." This information from Johnny will be collected every year, from k-12 education, on into college, and into the workforce. It is all part of the State Longtitudinal Database System (SLDS) that states are adopting to be in compliance with the Common Core Standards.

            Why am I against Common Core Data Mining? I went into teaching because of my love of children and my joy of being a part of igniting the spark of intellectual curiosity in young students. My father who had taught middle school history for 15 years always told me, “The most important element of education is the teacher in the classroom.” Building the relationship between the teacher and student and establishing trust, respect, and admiration between the two creates an environment conducive to learning for the young person. The Common Core Standards is a national policy designed to manage the entire nation’s population, treats individuals as cogs, and destroys what little remains of a positive educational environment. Sadly, it is just another depressing governmental, top-down program dictated to teachers and families. Horrifyingly, it will use modern technology to make decisions for the masses, and thus destroy the diversity and individuality of education and our country.

            On Common Core tests, along with answering question about academics, students will provide “Personally Identifiable Information.” And, sensitive information will be extracted, as well, such as:

1. Political affiliations or beliefs of the student or parent;
2. Mental and psychological problems of the student or the student's family;
3. Sex behavior or attitudes;
4. Illegal, anti-social, self-incriminating, and demeaning behavior;
5. Critical appraisals of other individuals with whom respondents have close family relationships;
6. Legally recognized privileged or analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians, and ministers;
7. Religious practices, affiliations, or beliefs of the student or the student's parent; or
8. Income (other than that required by law to determine eligibility for participation in a program or for receiving financial assistance under such program).

This information will then be managed by inBloom, Inc., a private organization funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It is preposterous to imagine any family wanting a private organization to collect and use private information over the childhood and young adulthood of family members.

There are many reasons why I do not like the Common Core Standards, but the strongest one involves data mining. Using technology to make education more efficient and commercial scares me because it treats individual students like data and it is open to corruption and abuse.

References:
Most of my information about Common Core testing I used to write this came from Diane Rufino's article. Her information is listed below. She referenced the other sites.

Heritage Foundation Conference (panel discussion) on Common Core: "Putting the Brakes on Common Core" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P40GaKlIwb8 (Panelists included Lindsey Burke of the Heritage Foundation, Jim Stergios of Pioneer Institute, Ted Rebarber of Accountability Works, Heather Crossin of Hoosiers Against Common Core, and Christel Swasey. Michele Malkin was a guest speaker)

Bob Luebke, "Common Core Will Impose an Unproven One-Size-Fits-All Curriculum on North Carolina," Civitas Institute, March 18, 2013. Referenced at: http://www.nccivitas.org/2013/common-core-imposes-one-size-fits-all-curriculum/

Bob Luebke, "Common Core: Worse Than You Think," Civitas Institute, April 11, 2013. Referenced at: http://www.nccivitas.org/2013/common-core-worse-than-you-think/

Dean Kalahar, "Common Core: Nationalized State-Run Education," American Thinker, April 12, 2013. Referenced at: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/common_core_nationalized_state-run_education.html

Mallory Sauer, "Data Mining Students Through Common Core, New American, April 25, 2013. Referenced at: http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/15213-data-mining-students-through-common-core

Rachel Alexander, "Common Core Curriculum: A Look Behind the Curtain of Hidden Language," Christian Post, April 18, 2013. Referenced at: http://www.christianpost.com/news/common-core-cirriculum-a-look-behind-the-curtain-of-hidden-language-92070/

Rufino, Diane, “For Love of God and Country,” http://www.beaufortobserver.net/Articles-NEWS-and-COMMENTARY-c-2013-05-13-266807.112112-COMMON-CORE-Common-Core-or-Rotten-to-the-Core-You-Decide.html

Data Mining, on the Glen Beck Show - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NjqOBEc3HU

Valerie Strauss, " A Tough Critique of Common Core on Early Childhood Education," The Washington Post, January 29, 2013. Referenced at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/01/29/a-tough-critique-of-common-core-on-early-childhood-education/

Reality Check: The Truth About Common Core -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AdiCGgxj58

0 Comments

Counter-Revolutionary Classical Education

A Bias Against Western Civilization and the United States of America - Textbooks

Common Core Standards

John De Gree

Receive Articles and Coupons in Your Email

Archives

Categories